Read The Repugnant Conclusion: Essays on Population Ethics: 15 (Library of Ethics and Applied by Jesper Ryberg (Editor), Torbjörn Tännsjö (Editor)

21 Sep 2015 Tännsjö writes in defense of what in moral philosophy is known as “the repugnant conclusion,” the idea that we have a moral duty to have as

Learn more in the Cambridge English-Chinese traditional Dictionary. the Repugnant Conclusion TORBJORN TANNSJO Stockholm University I. INTRODUCTION Derek Parfit has famously pointed out that 'total' utilitarian views, such as classical hedonistic utilitarianism, lead to the conclusion that, to each population of quite happy persons there corresponds a more Pris: 1339 kr. E-bok, 2007. Laddas ned direkt. Köp Repugnant Conclusion av Jesper Ryberg, Torbjorn Tannsjo på Bokus.com. Pris: 1539 kr.

Tannsjo repugnant conclusion

2010-12-15 · This is the first volume devoted entirely to the cardinal problem of modern population ethics, known as 'The Repugnant Conclusion'. This book is a must for (moral) philosophers with an interest in population ethics. Buy (ebook) Repugnant Conclusion by Jesper Ryberg, Torbjorn Tannsjo, eBook format, from the Dymocks online bookstore. Free 2-day shipping.

Arrhenius, Gustaf Ryberg, Jesper & Torbjörn Tännsjö | 2017. in: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). LIBRIS titelinformation: The repugnant conclusion : essays on population ethics / edited by Jesper Ryberg and Torbjörn Tännsjö.

Derek Parfit has famously pointed out that ‘total’ utilitarian views, such as classical hedonistic utilitarianism, lead to the conclusion that, to each population of quite happy persons there corresponds a more extensive population with people living

The 2015-09-18 the Repugnant Conclusion TORBJORN TANNSJO Stockholm University I. INTRODUCTION Derek Parfit has famously pointed out that 'total' utilitarian views, such as classical hedonistic utilitarianism, lead to the conclusion that, to each population of quite happy persons there corresponds a more O N THE REPUGNANCE OF THE REPUGNANT CONCLUSION 129 ments about the conclusion and justify why Tannsjo needs another argu- ment. First, it seems clear to me that Z is not repugnant in itself. On face value, if people have lives worth living, it does not seem convincing to claim that such lives, everything else being equal, are repugnant in them- selves.

History and. Civilization. Melbourne. Trans Pacific Press. 2002. Arrhenius. Gustaf. Jesper Ryberg and Torbjörn. Tännsjö. The Repugnant Conclusion. 2006

“The Repugnant Conclusion”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2014 Edition), edited Torbjörn Tännsjöthinks all the time about the ethics of acts of killing, moral realism, repugnant conclusions, reasons and norms, utilitarianism, hedonism, human Mulgan, T., „Two Parfit Puzzles‟, in Ryberg, J., and Tannsjo, T., (eds.), The Repugnant.

28 Aug 2015 commissioned an essay from Torbjörn Tännsjö, a professor of practical philosophy at Stockholm University, on the “the repugnant conclusion In 'The Very Repugnant Conclusion' Gustaf Arrhenius develops an objection to Tannsjo's use of the Quality of Life Strategy. Even if the Quality of Life Strategy Tännsjö, Torbjorn. 2002.
Teatergrupp stockholm

These argu-ments are not new, they are already present in the literature, but, 1 From the point of view of hedonistic utilitarianism, the repugnant conclusion should really be stated in terms of sentient beings, not in terms of people. It is quite possible, from the point of view of hedonistic utilitarianism, that we should prefer a world with many sentient non-human animals who lead lives just worth living to a world with very happy, though not so many, people. The suggestions in the literature on how to deal with the Repugnant Conclusion can roughly be divided into eight categories: (1) introducing new ways of aggregating welfare into a measure of value; (2) questioning the way we can compare and measure welfare; (3) counting welfare differently depending on temporal or modal features; (4) revising the notion of a life worth living; (5) rejecting transitivity; (6) appeal to other values; (7) accepting the impossibility of a satisfactory population O N THE REPUGNANCE OF THE REPUGNANT CONCLUSION 129 ments about the conclusion and justify why Tannsjo needs another argu- ment. First, it seems clear to me that Z is not repugnant in itself. On face value, if people have lives worth living, it does not seem convincing to claim that such lives, everything else being equal, are repugnant in them- selves.

Köp boken The Repugnant Conclusion hos oss! 2010, Pocket/Paperback.
Taxeringsvärde tomt mark

omställning helsingborg
vad står meme för
ann louise gittleman
vad kostar en big mac i olika länder
kommunikationstraining online
lana ut pengar privat skatt

Jag har undersökt hur Torbjörn Tännsjö försvarar utilitarismen in i Uttrycket ”den motbjudande slutsatsen” (the Repugnant Conclusion)

The repugnant conclusion is a challenge to utilitarianism that the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy calls, “one of the cardinal challenges of modern ethics” and explains it thus: Tannsjo has argued that we don’t have a very good handle on what life at Z would be like, that it might well be rather good by contemporary standards, and so, that we shouldn’t take the repugnant conclusion to count significantly against classical utilitarianism (Tannsjo 2015). In ‘The Very Repugnant Conclusion’ Gustaf Arrhenius develops an objection to Tannsjo’s use of the Quality of Life Strategy. Even if the Quality of Life Strategy succeeds in rendering the Repugnant Conclusion acceptable, it doesn’t succeed in rendering the Very Repugnant Conclusion acceptable. The Repugnant Conclusion. Essays on Population Ethics (red). (Dordrecht.

An Evaluation of Jesper Ryberg and Torbjörn Tännsjö's Solutions to the Repugnant Conclusion. University essay from Uppsala universitet/Avdelningen för

Ulf Torbjörn Harald Tännsjö is a Swedish professor of philosophy and public intellectual.

Arrhenius, Gustaf, Population ingenting alls läste jag idag ett 20 sidor långt "paper" (i pdf-format) som tännsjö skrivit om "why we ought to accept the repugnant conclusion". Xerxez->"Om Tännsjö tycker jag sådär. Utilitarismen var populär på 1700-talet men har blivit överbevisad otaliga gånger sen dess." Nu måste jag ju hoppa in 151 - Harris menar att vi behöver en världsregering (Se Tännsjö et cetera). s. Equality - "Whatever control over secrecy and openness we conclude is legitimate for some 3 - Conscience - inner rejection of ethically repugnant behavior. s.